26comments

Caption This! April 18-24

by Bitter Staff on April 18, 2009 in Comics

What in the Bitter Lawyer is going on in this picture?

Put your lawyerly wit to the test and post a comment with a hilarious caption about this judge’s discovery.  And keep it clean.  (Ish.) The editors’ favorite entry will be announced next Saturday, April 25th.

Editors’ Pick (April 11-17):



Snowman: “Mock Trial practice at Cooley.”

(First Runner-Up) Anonymous: “These comments bite the big one. I suggest that there be no ‘winner’ for these comments.” (And Anonymous is right, they all pretty well bit.)

{ 26 comments… read them below or add one }

Alma Federer April 18, 2009 at 5:18 am

I’ve GOT to get this zipper on this robe fixed!  My fellow learned jurists don’t appreciate sitting next to me when I smell like a public urinal.

Reply

ajc April 18, 2009 at 7:11 am

Hiding a hooker to blow me while I argued was the best idea ever!

Reply

Jonnie April 18, 2009 at 8:21 am

whoops…..!

Reply

Finch April 18, 2009 at 11:47 am

Looks like I owe Scalia twenty bucks. Turns out she couldn’t do it without leaving a stain.

Reply

Snowman April 18, 2009 at 1:10 pm

Hazing the new justice begins win the old Viagra in the water trick…

Reply

Butch Roberts April 19, 2009 at 5:43 am

“I’ll show them long arm jurisdiction!”

Reply

Butch Roberts April 19, 2009 at 5:44 am

“I am a superstar.”

Reply

Magic Circle Jerk April 19, 2009 at 11:24 am

amazing how these robes tent up!

Reply

Snowman April 19, 2009 at 11:45 am

Hazing the new justice begins with the old Viagra in the water trick…

(Typo in the other one – “with” not “win”)

Reply

Craig April 20, 2009 at 7:34 am

Bitter Lawyer can “suck it” if they didn’t like my caption entry last week!!!

Reply

Anonymous April 20, 2009 at 8:31 am

Oy!  How am I going to explain to the Chief Judge another one of these “strategically placed” stains?

Reply

Anonymous April 20, 2009 at 9:15 am

Get a life, Craig!

Reply

Tripp April 20, 2009 at 9:46 am

Oral arguments at the Supreme Court take a brief break while the respondent attorney demonstrates the proper technique for the Western Grip Hand Job.

Reply

Craig April 20, 2009 at 10:16 am

Anon, sorry if I was not clear, but my caption was what the guy in the picture is thinking. I could care less if Bitter Lawyer thinks my captions are funny. Get a sense of humor buddy.

Reply

Anonymous April 20, 2009 at 10:19 am

Ah, so THIS is what they mean when they refer to “SCOTUS SCROTUM!”

Reply

Anonymous April 20, 2009 at 10:32 am

I thought Craig’s was funny. Why would anyone take that personally?

Reply

Andrew April 20, 2009 at 12:23 pm

Counsel, your oral argument is very effective.

Reply

Anonymous April 20, 2009 at 1:42 pm

Craig, we are going to send c_broski after you unless you lighten up!  You may not be a dickwad, but you sure are acting like one.

Reply

LJ April 20, 2009 at 5:42 pm

I am an attorney and I came across this website.  I was so shocked and disgusted to find what feels more like a frat house forum and chauvinistic display of immaturity than an actual venue for professionals to have meaningful discussions about the legal profession.  I am ashamed that you would even be colleagues of mine.  This website is an embarrassment.

Reply

Barrister April 21, 2009 at 8:03 am

LJ,
Lighten up. Seriously, table the righteous indignation and join in the fun. Attorneys as a whole get a bad name from people like you. The stereotype of the humorless, emotionless, drone associate is perpetuated whenever a layperson interacts with an attorney such as yourself. Either post a funny comment or go back to document review. Dickhead.

Reply

The Great Decider April 21, 2009 at 11:49 am

To all who are offended by (sometimes very lame)attempts at humor: STOP WHINING! Your plattitudes are lame.

Reply

Anonymous April 21, 2009 at 1:23 pm

I read “LJ“‘s comment and am shocked and embarrassed.

That said, a great caption for the picture might be “The justice astounds his bench brethren onlookers with a brazen display of how a law clerk should really satisfy a judge—beneath his robes!”

***

Take THAT LJ!!

Reply

Anonymous April 21, 2009 at 2:26 pm

LJ–Lazy Jerk?  Loudmouth Jeebus?  Go easy, man, you need a serious BJ for the nerves.  Get a friggin’ life!  How long have been you out of TTT law school?

Reply

Anonymous April 22, 2009 at 2:35 pm

Wow! I had no idea that case was so stimulating!  Now I’m going to have to figure out how to get this stain out of this robe.

Reply

Alexis April 23, 2009 at 6:37 am

Hmm–I wonder if Junior Justice gets a vote?

Reply

Anonymous April 24, 2009 at 8:57 am

If only, US News had a rankings for this…

Reply

Leave a Comment

When you post a comment on this blog, you grant us the right to modify or delete your comment, but we have no duty to do so.

Previous post:

Next post: