2comments

Bitter News, 2-23-09

by Bitter Newsroom on February 23, 2009 in News

Quick headlines from the Bitter Newsroom, whether or not your law school is retiring in Florida:

Promptly closing shop at 5:00 PM got Texas’ “top criminal judge” charged with failing to ensure proper access to the legal system and eroding public confidence in the fairness of judges for an incident with a lawyer seeking a last-minute delay for a client’s execution.  [Statesman.com]

A top grad at a top law school?  Quit your bellyaching.  It’s all bueno for Big Firm jobs.  [The National Law Journal]

It’s not just Law Firm 10 who’s begging female attorneys to spruce up their look.  In these lean economic times, U.K. firms have brought in the big guns as a “perk” to teach lady lawyers to “embrace their inner femininity.” There’s a woman in there somewhere.  They swear.  [The Delaware Employment Law Blog]

Damn, who knew refusing to condemn waterboarding as torture was going to come back to haunt him so much?  UNC Law School’s pick of former Bush-administration Attorney General Michael Mukasey as commencement speaker is going over, well,…it isn’t going over.  [Myrtle Beach Online]

A gorilla law student in his natural habitat as observed by Diane Fossey?  My guess is that as long as the subject doesn’t go crazy and rip someone’s face off, it’s going to be pretty boring.  [Virginia Law Weekly]

We declare Junichi Semitsu the first Asian American Bitter Lawyer identified on this site.  Because we think Do the Right Thing got robbed by the Academy too.  [Angry Asian Man]

13comments

Caption This! Feb. 21-27

by Bitter Staff on February 21, 2009 in Comics

What in the Bitter Lawyer is going on in this picture?

Put your lawyerly wit to the test and post a comment with a hilarious caption about this funny face.  And keep it clean.  (Ish.) The editors’ favorite entry will be announced next Saturday, February 14th.

Editors’ Pick (Feb. 14-20):



ForthePlaintiff: “Counsel for Wyeth and Pfizer congratulate each other on a successful merger.”

Bitter News, 2-20-09

by Bitter Newsroom on February 20, 2009 in News

Quick headlines from the Bitter Newsroom that make your mom significantly prouder than The Dirtiest Girl in Porn’s:

For two attys, the bigger they are, the harder they fall—sort of literally…

1.  “Doughy” Pillsbury lawyer, Bob Robbins, head of the firm’s corporate and securities practice, got Gawkered after a tipster reported him for jabbering into a tin can with a string Bluetooth so loudly on an Acela train that he leaked yet-to-be-announced layoffs.  And ATL had no problem throwing him under the train he rode in on.  [Above the Law]

2.  Watch out, Dreier, you’ve got some steep lawyer-impersonating competition.  Only this one went down hard and has a penchant for Hillary Clinton.  (Sorry, Hill, that’s not a sexual innuendo.) An abogado maybe.  But Mauricio Celis is definitely not a lawyer.  [Houston Chronicle]

Roland (Dis)Bar-ris?  People are calling not only for the Senator’s resignation but for his law license too.  [Chicago Sun-Times]

We’re all wondering what will to become of the mighty Anteaters of Law after their grand opening this fall, but they’ve already hit the ground running as the 10th-ranked law school according to a “scholarly impact rating.” [Brain Leiter’s Law School Rankings]

Nothing says “Dare to dream” quite like Anita Cannibal’s hopes of owning a law practice and a brothel of her very own.  Remember her?  She’s the 39-year-old West Los Angeles School of Law student and who hooks at Nevada’s Chicken Ranch.  [Los Angeles Times]

Hey there, laid-off lawyer, get your spirit and your chutzpah back by referencing a website—or 30.  And with sites like Mint, Workstir and Pentyoffish, it’s sure to be a well-rounded jobless experience.  [Mashable]

10comments

Bitter Factoids 4

by Bitter Staff on February 20, 2009 in Columns

Let the numbers tell the story.  Here are 15 more compelling facts from Bitter Lawyer.  We leave the opinions up to you.

27. Percentage of lawyers identified as self-employed according to the U.S. Department of Labor, 2008-09 Handbook.

$20,000,000. Annual amount attorney James Sokolove, who refers all cases to other lawyers, spends on advertising according to Boston Magazine.

11. Number of law schools with provisional ABA approval.

90.5. Percentage of graduates from ABA-approved law schools who passed New York’s July 2008 bar exam on their first attempt according to the New York State Board of Law Examiners.

7. Number of U.S. Senators who graduated from UVA Law School.

681. Number of local attorneys in the office of Chicago’s largest law firm, Kirkland & Ellis, according Crain’s Chicago Business.

13. Number of Loyola University Chicago School of Law graduates employed firm-wide at Kirkland & Ellis.

5. Number of men billing themselves as lawyers on “Men Seeking Women” personals on Los Angeles Craigslist.

0. The number of women on Los Angeles Craigslist who say they are looking to date a male lawyer.

£1,000. Amount of capital each partner at Allen & Overy is being asked to give back to the firm per equity point according to Legal Week.

$83,000,000. Amount Florida lawyer John Yanchek allegedly helped his clients steal through fraudulent real estate loans according to the Sarasota Herald Tribune.

$12,336. Average living and book expenses for a single law student living on campus in the U.S. according to the American Bar Association.

$30,000. Annual salary for a U.S. District Court judge in 1968 according to U.S. Courts.

$169,300. Annual salary for a U.S. District Court judge in 2008 according to U.S. Courts.

Got a fascinating factoid to share? Of course you do. Email us at info@bitterlawyer.com

Bitter News, 2-19-09

by Bitter Newsroom on February 19, 2009 in News

Quick headlines from the Bitter Newsroom:

Words like “lower starting salaries,” “delayed start dates,” and “sharply reduced summer classes” can help dial up the resent, but perhaps the only thing more severe than being a Bitter Lawyer is no longer being a lawyer at all.  Here are some layoff tactics.  Act cool.  [The National Law Journal]

Even a Harvard Law professor suggests using some laymen talk and leaving the legalese elsewhere when it comes to Facebook.  That is how you rule the world’s sixth-largest non-existent country.  Put that in your Cyberlaw Clinic and smoke it.  [The New York Times]

I certainly don’t mean to imply that the law firm in question is affiliated with BitterLawyer.com, but how did Jones Day (http://www.jonesday.com/) get such an absurd settlement?  It seems they found the one judge that isn’t hip to the glories of the internet[The Consumerist]

“The Justice Department and the Bush administration were relatively quiet on the issue of race and its place within the social fabric of America.” And now attorney general Eric Holder is coming out swinging by calling America “a nation of cowards” on race.  Maybe feeling a little too white for the room, former AG Michael Mukasey has decided to join the social fabric of Debevoise & Plimpton as a partner.  [Chicago Tribune]

The Massachusetts School of Law blew a gasket and canceled class.  Ohhh, the punch lines.  [Andover Townsman]

Italy has a Teflon prime minister who can’t seems to get stuck with any of the number of corruption charges aimed at him.  Which is somewhat easy to do when you have a super-sexy English lawyer taking your bullets.  [The New York Times]

22comments

Eight Billable Hour Scams

by PhilaLawyer on February 19, 2009 in Columns

Post image for Eight Billable Hour Scams

Perhaps you’ve read the The New York Times article about Even Chesler, the Cravath partner who calls for lawyers to “get rid of the billable hour.” It focuses on why, in this new economy, corporate America will no longer pay outrageous prices for litigation services.

In the wake of that thrust are a few small references to the inefficiencies and, in some cases, outright frauds, invited by the billable hour system. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, aside from the well-known practice of bill padding, few specifics are considered.

I’d like to remedy that here and offer some detailed examples of the more nuanced forms of chicanery engendered by our current billing model. Here are eight of the more insidious ways some of us separate clients from their wallets. The ones nobody ever catches.

1Fluffing the Exposure. Clients decide how much money to spend on their defense based on how much they stand to lose. The average case a decent billable hour firm handles is a basic breach of contract claim, limiting the plaintiff’s recovery to the amount of money it would have been entitled to under the contract. Plaintiff’s counsel will often fix this disadvantage by adding tort claims, like fraud or breach of good faith and fair dealing, which add the threat of additional damages. Technically.

A half-witted defense lawyer knows that most of these add-ons are naked leverage plays. Whether he tells the client that, however, is another issue. If the client thinks those claims have a chance, it’ll pay more in defense costs. The enhanced risk also provides “Success Insurance.” So if the actual exposure is $1 million, but the client thinks its $1.7 million, a $1 million settlement with $300,000.00 in attorneys’ fees looks like a win.

2“Wal-Mart” Document Review. One of the greatest revenue sources in law is a dirty warehouse of old, dingy paper. In any piece of large, complex litigation, there’s an archive of documents—in Rochester, St. Paul or Topeka—in which some bit of material one of the parties might need to make its case is scattered amongst 50,000 boxes of irrelevant pulp. Teams fly to the location and spend weeks searching through boxes, making spreadsheet indexes of documents no one will ever read and sending thousands of copies to the firm’s home office, where a team of techies (at another cost to the client) turn them into searchable databases. While they do that, associates and paralegals from the opponents’ firm watch, to make sure no documents are hidden or destroyed. Thousands of dollars per hour until every conceivably relevant piece of paper has been vetted.

And that’s just an example of actual firm employees reading the paper at issue. The new model, the “Wal-Mart” approach, is much more lucrative. All you need is a boiler room of temps or independent contractors (young, unemployed lawyers from lousy schools with no other job prospects) to read the material at $35.00-$50.00 per hour, while you bill the client a hefty markup on the labor. The St. Mary’s Upstairs College of Law graduates scanning those documents are technically lawyers. And that credential allows you to tell the client “attorneys” are reviewing the material.

If the firm’s new associates would be billed out at $250.00 per hour for that same work, a contract lawyer should at least warrant, say, $100.00-150.00 per hour. The client won’t complain. It thinks it’s getting a deal.

3Volunteering. Litigation’s a piecework business—no profit in having your opponent’s lawyer do something you can do yourself. We kill each other in open court, but when it comes time for one of us to prepare an order for the judge’s signature or a first draft of a settlement agreement, we’re suddenly doing an “Alphonse & Gaston” routine with one another.

“Oh, I’ll take the first crack at drafting the agreement.”
“No, allow me. I’ve done one in a similar case before.”

If your opponent crafts the initial version of anything, he gets the lion’s share of billable time out of the project. In the case of a settlement agreement, doing the first draft can be the better part of a day’s worth of billables.

And if a client asks why you didn’t let the other side create the first draft, the answer is always, “Because I wanted to control the process, to make sure you were protected.”

4Double Dipping. The quickest way to stack up billable hours is a traveling assignment. If your opponent demands you take deposition halfway across the country, don’t fight him. It’s an economic opportunity where you bill for every minute of the travel. Then stack on that all of the time you spend on other clients’ cases during the trip. Using this approach, a twelve-hour trip from Philadelphia to Detroit for a deposition can net a total of seventeen billable hours.[1]

And nobody who’d care would ever find out you were billing two different clients at the same time. The overlapping entries appear on separate invoices, the laws of physics in the billable world applying on a client-by-client basis.

[1] 5 hrs on plane (assuming a modest PHL delay) + 3 hrs in deposition + 4 hrs driving to/from airport, checking in and waiting for rental car/cab + 5 billable hrs working on other cases on plane/in airport/in cab = 17 hrs.

5Scorched Earth. The smallest case can turn into a billing bonanza, if you run it the right way and set a nasty tone:

  • Get opposing counsel pissed early by ignoring his letters.
  • Develop an acrimonious relationship where you only communicate in writing. Letters run up a lot more in fees than phone calls.
  • When the opponent demands documents from your client, respond with a high-handed, curt reply. “Your request is overly broad. If you hone it to a succinct category of material, I’ll be able to respond.” The average litigator is stressed, irritable, and has an eggshell ego. A cryptic response is taken as an insult. He’ll snap and file a motion with the court, which is what you want. And since most judges are Solomonic, they’ll order you to produce two-thirds of what your opponent demanded. You look like a winner to your client and pick up a pile of billable hours you wouldn’t have had otherwise.
  • When your client’s deposed, object to everything. Direct your client not to answer a wide variety of questions, forcing your opponent to file a motion compelling him to do so. You look like a bulldog to your client, get the billable time for preparing a response to another motion, and if the court orders your client to answer what he previously didn’t, you’ll be awarded additional billables for preparing him for and representing him at a second deposition.

These are just a few examples. If you used those tactics alone, you’d could add 20 hours to your bills. At $250 per hour, that’s $5,000.00, just for being an asshole.

6Pre-Fabs. It’s all derivative, and litigation’s no exception. Whatever brief a lawyer’s writing, it’s been written before—and it’s somewhere in the firm’s server. A decent lawyer can cut and paste together the guts of a legal argument in an hour or two.

  • Dave Chappelle = Richard Pryor
  • George Clooney = Cary Grant
  • Pam Anderson = Jane Mansfield
  • All rock music is a variation on the riff from “Satisfaction” or “Paranoid”
  • Everything on television is a rehash of plotlines from Seinfeld or M.A.S.H.

The question then is how to bill for that work. A lot of litigators say you should bill them for the “value” of the work—approximating the hours it took to create the template you used, plus your case-specific modifications.

Sounds like a good deal, but I wonder: How do you do that? Look up the associate who wrote the original papers five years ago, call him at his new firm and ask him how long it took? Call accounting and see if they have his old time sheet handy?

7Blind Alleyways . The central issues in a contract dispute aren’t difficult to predict. The words of the agreement limit the universe of available arguments, and there are only so many credible interpretations of the parties’ duties. You tend to learn the two or three important facts, pieces of evidence and issues that will decide the dispute pretty early in the case.

Keep them to yourself. A lot of clients like to play attorney and discuss peripheral matters they think are relevant to a claim or defense. No harm in encouraging them to flex their inner Clarence Darrows. The more issues raised, the more work done:

MEMO
To: Client, File
Re: The Napoleonic Code Does Not Apply in Indiana

The client won’t complain—it raised them.

8The Babel Effect. The best way to ensure a client doesn’t complain about a bill is to write it in language he can’t understand. Lawyers do the same thing bankers, insurance agents and every other category of middleman does: Blur the simplicity of the service they provide with silly industry language that makes it seem complex enough to justify the fee.

  • Brokers use words like “no load,” “field bet” or “collar.”
  • Consultants run “models,” talk about “synergies,” or say how some strategy is “baked into” a broader plan.
  • Litigators talk in terms of “statutory preclusion,” “stare decisis” and “promissory estoppel,” and filing things like “demurrers,” appointing “guardians ad litem” or creating “constructive trusts.”

Who understands a 1.1-hour billing entry for “Analysis of North Carolina civil procedure rules to determine form of affidavit for submission of letters rogatory to serve subpoena duces tecum”?

Baffling bills are a win/win. If a client calls with questions about the charges, that’s a billing event. And the more confusing they are, the longer the call.

No one likes this shit. It’s offensive, backhanded and creepy. And what’s its root cause? The billable hour. A compensation system built to reward inefficiency, married to a profession providing endless pretexts for needless work and granting its abusers impenetrable deniability.

I’d say aggressive self-policing is the answer, but that’s as likely to succeed in the litigation business as it did in investment banking. The only solution is to completely align the client’s interests with those of its lawyers. Incentivize counsel to dispose of cases as fast and cheaply as possible, the way they would if they were paying the fees.

And the only way to do that is to get rid of the billable hour.

Bitter News, 2-18-09

by Bitter Newsroom on February 18, 2009 in News

Quick headlines from the Bitter Newsroom:

Status Update: Facebook is…reverting to my old Terms of Use since everybody freaked the f*%k out so badly.  Chill people.  [Associated Press]

With almost fortuitous timing comes the newest sex-for-cash headline story that may have played out differently if the john had been a “perfect customer” lawyer.  It’s the age-old story of man hires hooker, man falls for hooker, hooker leverages the power of her vagine to blackmail man, man plays ball, hooker wants more, man can’t handle and goes to authorities, authorities protect man’s identity and put the bolts to the hooker for extortion.  [Boston.com]

Sen. Roland Burris—Take 4!  And then maybe just think about going ahead and resigning.  [Chicago Tribune]

See that red flag?  Those colors run.  A Proskauer Rose attorney’s withdrawal from Allen Stanford’s alleged $8-billion fraud tipped off the SEC and has everyone insisting, “Gimmie my money.” [Bloomberg]

Trump and his flashy casinos got lassoed and hogtied in Chapter 11 down at the OK bankruptcy corral.  [Am Law Daily]

Being an NYU Law School dropout is Demetri Martin‘s least interesting bit of material.  [RedandBlack.com]


41comments

Post image for How to Lose a Non-Lawyer Boyfriend

Even though I could easily fill my dance card with adultery-craving perverts masquerading as partners, this past holiday season marked the end of (yet another) fairly promising dating relationship with a non-lawyer.

The most-recent contestant eliminated from my secret reality game show “Who Wants To Make Me a Millionaire Stay-at-Home Mom” (just being honest) was an incredible, upwardly mobile MBA who was also the most attractive guy I’ve dated since I was 19.
Keep Reading ⇒

Bitter News, 2-17-09

by Bitter Newsroom on February 17, 2009 in News

Quick headlines from the Bitter Newsroom, since the coast is now clear of attack chimps:

Downer alert: Lawyers are twice as susceptible to depression than the general population and 3.6 times more than employed people.  And male lawyers specifically?  Forget about it. You’re a breeding ground for disillusionment.  [Cleveland.com]

Are we all being p3wned by Facebook?  Do they own us?  Is their new Terms of Use “not unusual” for the Internet, or have we relinquished ourselves to the social networking site forever?  [The New York Times]

Perhaps I should save all questions for tomorrow’s “Ask a Lawyer Day.” [Triangle Business Journal]

In accordance to the current American trend, change is coming to The American Bar Association.  They’ve nominated Stephen N. Zack as their new President-elect, which means he’d would be the first Hispanic hold the office.  If he can wait until August 2010.  [South Florida Sun-Sentinel]

318 days until World Series of Beer Pong V.  Former Chicago intellectual property associate Billy Gaines is the event’s founder and making a biz out of the drinking game that’s been getting co-eds sufficiently drunk in frat houses for years.  [Am Law Daily]

Just as we mentioned an online review site for escorts in today’s exclusive story, there’s now a Yelp-like way for Massachusetts lawyers to post comments and review judges at JudgeCenter.com[Gloucester Daily Times]

14comments

[Ed. Note: Many of links included in this post connect to sites that feature sexual content.  So you probably don’t want to click on them at the office.]

The fact that lawyers frequent hookers isn’t a momentous revelation. What is newsworthy, however, is that most hookers consider attorneys to be “perfect customers.”

Since lawyers are frequently called whores—and since each month brings a new BigLaw-hooker scandal (yeah, we’re looking at you, anonymous Cravath partner)—we decided to investigate why lawyers and hookers make such terrific bedfellows.

Sex Life: The First Casualty Of BigLaw

Being among the highest-paid hourly workers, lawyers tend to have difficulty finding time for a personal life—especially compared to other professions, says “Jane,” a New York City escort who blogs at Debauchette.com. Jane explains that over-worked, under-sexed men are her best clients and that those men frequently tend to be lawyers at some of the world’s biggest firms.

“Lawyers have very little free time, and their relationships suffer for it,” Jane explains. “Sex is usually the first thing to go… [Lawyers] are pretty sex deprived. Which is great. I love being with a man who hasn’t been laid in a while. The sex is fantastic.”

A sentiment seconded by Veronica Franco, a Los Angles-based escort, who jokes that the best way to ruin her business would be to “bomb Century City.” According to Franco, lawyers account for the lion’s share of her clientele because they have little time to seek out a sexual release.

“You can’t just call up your girlfriend at 10 p.m. and say, ‘let’s [have sex]’ and then go back to work an hour later,” Franco says, adding that her clients choose to see escorts because it’s “one of the few ways a busy man can balance work and sex.”

It’s All About the Billables

Just like lawyers, escorts come in a variety of price ranges. For every ambulance chaser, there’s a nasty streetwalker. For every Big Firm partner, there’s a madam with a stable of elegant women. And for every associate, there’s a $300-per-hour escort.

At the end of the day, it all comes down to money. “You put your cash on the table, and you get what you want,” one anonymous attorney told Bitter Lawyer. “It’s just that easy. You take care of business, hand over some cash, then before you know it, you’re watching ESPN…”

Like most lawyers, escorts work on an hourly billing regime that puts exacting billing demands on its practitioners. In lawyers, escorts see likeminded creatures—each beholden to the demands of the outrageous billable hour.

Veronica Monet, a self-described courtesan from San Francisco, says she’s been with too many lawyers to count and gives the legal profession high marks for understanding the value of time.

“I love lawyers,” Monet says. “The main difference I’ve noticed between them and other professions is that lawyers tend to be less likely to take a superior attitude toward me. They pay in full, on time, without resentment or haggling. What’s not to like?”

Or, as Veronica Franco says, “A lot of men hear you say the price per hour, but when it comes down to it, many think they’re entitled to more. Lawyers don’t give you that kind of trouble—an hour is an hour.”

While individual experiences vary, the overwhelming sentiment from escorts was that lawyers generally made better clients than doctors, bankers or other professionals. Mainly because lawyers curiously got high marks for failing to live up to negative stereotypes associated with the profession. Where as doctors are generally deemed “arrogant” and bankers typically “jerks,” many escorts used kind words when regarding their lawyer clients. None referred to lawyers as egotistical, pompous or even (interestingly) hard bargainers.

Consider Jane’s (turgid) assessment of her lawyer clients:

“I’d say that lawyers come across as acutely intelligent and emotionally exhausted. They’re incredibly self-aware and sometimes neurotic, which I like. Sometimes they’re fraught with crushing existential angst, which I also like. I like lawyers as clients. I like how they think.”

BigStress

While men see escorts for a wide range of reasons, one common denominator is stress.

“Lawyers come in, and their bodies are so tense.  You can just tell,” Franco says. “It’s a high-stress job—often boring, and there’s a lot of pressure. Everyone needs some kind of release for that.  And for most men, it’s either sex or drinking.”

Veronica Franco, it turns out, is a keen observer, according to Jeff Schultz, an Arizona-based therapist who treats men with sexual disorders, including those who frequent prostitutes. While Schultz doesn’t agree that using escorts is part of a healthy sex life, he does say that high-stress jobs can be a trigger for many men.

“The root cause of this kind of behavior is always an early altering experience,” Schultz says. “I treat a lot of lawyers, and there are several reasons for that, but one critical factor is certainly the intensity of their jobs.”

According to Laraine Russo Harper, a former manager of a Nevada cathouse and author of the book Legal Tender: True Tales of a Brothel Madam, that stress and intensity is frequently channeled into an interest in sadomasochism.

“We got a lot of lawyers and judges,” Harper reports, adding that members of the bar were typically the most common denizens of the brothel’s S&M facilities.  “I think they just wanted a time for themselves when they could just relax, let go, and not have to make any decisions.  After an S&M session, you could just see on their faces that the weight of the world had been lifted from their shoulders.”

Jane agrees. In the good ol’ days, when she too offered S&M services, the vast majority of her clients were lawyers. In fact, one kinky associate still ranks as her favorite client.

“[He] liked coercive role-play fantasies,” Jane recounts. “I would play the role of a married woman who would beg for something—maybe for him to give my husband his job back.  He’d agree, but only under the condition that I [perform a certain sex act]. So, I would play the role of the unwilling housewife, mortified by the idea of being reduced to whoredom.”

And while stress can come with the territory for any profession, lawyers produce it in spades, which indubitably leads to increased demand for escorts.

“A lot of lawyers I see don’t come here for a [sex]fest,” Veronica Franco says. “They make all this money, but they have no life, and I feel sorry for them. They come to me to relax and to experience something sensual. I really enjoy helping them unwind.”

Hush Money

Whatever else can be said about lawyers, nearly all members of the profession take their duty of confidentiality seriously. Apparently, the same goes for escorts, all of whom were adamant about protecting their clients’ identities, including one dominatrix who declined to share even her clients’ anonymous requests.

“That’s inappropriate. Confidentiality, you know?” Mistress Matisse defends.

Since lawyers exist in an environment where loose lips mean risking professional sanctions and civil liability; for escorts, esquire clients are generally the least hazardous.  With regard to discretion, those in the legal profession get high praise for their ritualistic devotion to secrecy, a critical part of the hooker-john relationship. 

And while most escort arrangements are never discovered, when a lawyer is out-ed as a sex client—either by a spouse or, forbid, the press—a self-destructive streak is usually to blame, Jane explains.

“Some want to get caught, consciously or unconsciously, so they get sloppy and reckless,” Jane says. “[Yet] some seem to think they’re untouchable, or they have too much confidence in their ability to be discreet.”

Though according to Jane, lawyers who want to get caught are the exception. Without being told, most lawyers take basic security precautions like not using their work phone or email. And those who make security mistakes usually take kindly to instructions to beef up discretion, an anonymous Chicago-based escort reports.

After all, as a number of escorts pointed out, unlike bankers or other professionals, lawyers have an innate aversion to risk, a honed trait essential to keeping hookers in business.

Love Me Tender

At the end of the day, the perfect client is one who understands that what happened during the hour was merely a business transaction. But the emergence of a service known as The Girlfriend Experience (GFE) sometimes blurs that line.

The precise definition of GFE is murky, but according to the escorts, the term is a catchall for a more personal touch, including kissing and cuddling. The experience is meant to combine the punch of great sex with the emotional connection (albeit for a limited time) of a relationship.

“When I first heard the term GFE, I thought it was code for bad sex. Who would want to pay to have the kind of sex you could have with your girlfriend?” Veronica Franco jokes. “But I guess people are into trends, and being able to buy sex that’s a little more loving is just one of those trends now.”

For Franco, who charges an additional $100 per hour for the GFE, the trend is paying dividends. But like any powerful marketing tool, the GFE is also prone to creating false expectations among customers. Many of her GFE clients have invited her to dinner, shows and other date-like activities, all in an attempt to chip away at the escort-client relationship and build a real romance. According to Jodi Conway, a New Jersey-based psychotherapist, men frequently fall prey to an amorous delusion.

“Many men believe that they have a real relationship with an escort,” Conway says.  “They believe that the escort really likes them.  Like a girlfriend.  They rationalize that they’re not paying for sex. They see themselves as special. But the moment the guy stops paying, it’s done.”

It’s that scenario that women like Veronica Franco seek to avoid. While Conway says one profession isn’t less susceptible than another when it comes to falling for escorts, Franco thinks lawyers handily beat the odd in this department.

“Lawyers get it,” Franco says. “They understand that my time is worth something. Time is money. Lawyers totally get what I do. That’s why I get along with them so well. If a guy is going to fall for me and start trying to take me out, odds are he’s not one of my lawyer clients.”

Does that mean lawyers have a monopoly on mental health? Far from it. Conway says men who see escorts are addicts with a serious problem that will—eventually—cause havoc in their personal (and possibly) professional lives. It’s that very threat of losing everything they’ve worked for that has prompted many lawyers to seek her help. In fact, Conway reports a spike in white-collar clientele in the wake of the Eliot Spitzer scandal.

But for every lawyer who seeks counseling, there are countless more who find it more pragmatic to continue seeing escorts.

“If you’re emotionally unavailable and you have [certain sexual] needs, what else are you going to do?” Veronica Franco asks.

Rather than a therapist, the typical outlet is a Google query that lands on sites like Eros-Guide.com or CityVibe.com where users can seek out local escorts by hair color, race, breast size, services menu and a host of other criteria. Discerning consumers can even register for user-generated sites like TheEroticReview.com, which is basically Yelp for the sex service industry.

Sadly, none of these sites—or any of the therapists Bitter Lawyer spoke with—offer an ABA discount.

Talk about a missed marketing opportunity.

Check out other Bitter Exclusives.