clothes

7comments

shutterstock_49878208

The battle between skirt suit and pant suit is fierce, one that pits traditional values against comfort. Here is my personal list of pros and cons.

Keep Reading ⇒

1comment

jacket pant love

My Dearest Maribel,

The nights in this office are lonely without you. I sit in this tight, wooden, box, shoved up against other jackets just like me. Jackets who are lonely, scared, missing their pants partners just like I am. Some guys get to talking—about where they’re from, what they are going to do once they get out of here. I never was one for talking. I just stare at your photo and the note you left in my pocket. That note that says this is a two-piece item that cannot be sold separately lets me know we were meant to be together. We were sold together but stored separately. It keeps me up nights.

Keep Reading ⇒

7comments

Post image for 10 Signs You Are Dressed Unprofessionally

There is an epidemic in the legal community. Maybe it is because of the economy. Maybe it is because the lackluster hiring rate for new lawyers. Perhaps it has something to do with the Mayan Doomsday (Just three weeks away!!!). However, we are in the Trust Tree so lets get this out in the open. The legal community is committing malpractice . . . of fashion. This might be considered mean to some of you. That means you dress inappropriately.  Thus, without further adieu, Bitter Lawyer presents: 10 Signs You Are Dressed Unprofessionally.

Keep Reading ⇒

4comments

Post image for Cease and Desist Demand re: Men Wearing Sandals

CEASE AND DESIST DEMAND

TO: Men
FROM: Women
RE: The wearing of sandals for men (hereafter, “mandals”)
DATE: May 1, 2012

Dear Sir(s):

This CEASE AND DESIST DEMAND is to inform you that your repeated wearing of mandals has become unbearable for myself, along with the women I represent. Such anti-social behavior is completely unacceptable and will not be tolerated in any way, shape, or form.
Keep Reading ⇒

29comments

Post image for Attention Idiot Lawyers: Business Casual Explained

Every summer there’s one phrase floating around law firms that causes a great deal of stress, confusion and annoyance for the horde of twentysomethings starting their first professional job. No, not “law firm hot”—I’m talking about “business casual.” Even for seasoned attorneys, its meaning can be harder to pin down than “substantive due process.”

Business casual causes so many problems because people want to define it in isolation.  However, to truly understand this fashion limbo you have to think of it in relation to two other dress codes: Business formal and dressy casual.
Keep Reading ⇒

39comments

Post image for Why Does J. Crew Hate My Breasts?

I swear on my life, this is the last time I’m going to allow myself to be seduced by the blouses in a J. Crew catalog. Either that, or I’m going to have to get a breast reduction.

I made two mistakes this past week:

First, I violated my strict rule against oxford-style shirts by ordering a J. Crew chambray popover.

Second, I decided to wear said blouse to work.  That’s how deluded I was by its bewitching powers, which beckoned from the body of a model who clearly never had to deal with the nightmares of puberty.

That day, as if on cue, my office phone rang with an internal call early in the morning. It was a partner that I despise more than anyone in the world because of his near-sociopathic mixture of insecurity, sadism, legal talent and a bad temper. He demanded that I meet him in a conference room to discuss a “small research assignment.”

I said a couple of Hail Marys, braced myself for his demonic powers and pushed open the conference room door. Immediately, I noticed him staring at my chest like a sixth-grade boy who found his father’s porn stash.

I instinctively glanced down at myself. The conservative blouse suddenly looked insanely provocative, pulled tight across my D-cup chest. I was struck with the fear that I looked like I was begging for an impromptu wet oxford contest. When I had a chance, I unbuttoned an extra button in an effort to loosen the blouse, which, of course, only made me look like I was trying to titillate him further.

Much to my chagrin—and thanks to the blouse’s unwitting display of my breasts—he ended up installing me as a permanent fixture on his case.  Without ever making even one instance of eye contact with me during our 45 minutes together in the conference room. I suspect he took the blouse as a tacit indication that I found his sadistic qualities irresistible and wanted to commence sex immediately—a sensation that isn’t altogether unfamiliar.

He’s since dropped by my office unannounced and without good reason each day—stomping in with his gaze fixed downward 45-degrees.  And for four days in a row, I’ve witnessed his dissatisfaction in discovering yet another full-coverage cardigan.  If I’m lucky, maybe he’ll conclude that I’m a tease and spring me from the case.

But in the meantime, I’m utterly stuck with him and his nasty lechery. Since I can’t take my frustration directly out on him, I’m focusing my pent-up rage instead on the entity most deserving of the blame for this tragedy: J. Effing Crew.

After years of blowing a serious portion of my salary at Neiman Marcus and Saks on the work attire of my lawyerly dreams, I finally realized the frivolity of devoting money to a business wardrobe that’s largely wasted on legions of tasteless, mouth-breathing lawyers within an office that has about as much glamour as a crypt.

So, I turned to J. Crew—the one retailer that is supposed to allow me to maintain my predilection for professional style without squandering the entirety of my checking account. The fashion cretins at my firm certainly don’t know the difference between Theory and J. Crew, which means I can devote the money saved to more amusing vices. Like vodka.

I’ve relied on their Jackie cardigan as my unofficial daily uniform for a while now.  I own about 14 of the cute, feminine (and largely un-provocative) sweaters in a variety of colors.  But then I got tired of being nagged about my almost OCD-like devotion to the same cardigan.  The question I hear most at the office—other than, “When will you have that done?”—is, “Don’t you own anything other than those cardigans?” So I decided to try out a few J. Crew new-arrival blouses.

Which brings me to a fact that all female lawyers and law students must understand.  It’s so serious that it requires me to reveal my bra size—32D.  And the fact is this: Women, like me, who are thin but have large breasts, look utterly ridiculous in oxford shirts.  It’s either oversized frumpy or undersized slutty. There’s nothing in between. Yet I allowed myself to believe in J. Crew’s infallibility, which has ended with me becoming a full-time underling to a partner I hate.

It should have been obvious, as I re-flip through the catalog. At first glance, all of the blouses looked irresistibly appealing and of-the-moment. But it’s now clear that the willowy models, all of whom are built like Keira Knightley, are the reason that the button-down shirts look so seductively perfect. These are not women who sit in ergonomic desk chairs every waking hours.  Sure, they’re all as pale as I am, but that’s where the comparison ends. I suddenly realized that in 70 pages, there wasn’t a single breast, curvy thigh, or hip to be found.

The attributes of the oxford did not evolve with the female form in mind. They are, first and foremost, shirts for men. And with the obvious exception of 38% of the men in my office, the male form for which they were originally intended does not have breasts. So it’s no real surprise that oxford shirts look best on women with small chests.

Unfortunately, I don’t work for Anna Wintour. I work in a depressing law firm. Nor do I have time midday to seek out macrobiotic foods and Equinox ellipticals.  Even if I did, I still couldn’t change the architecture of my body that much. That thanks goes to the Italian genes that endowed me with hips and boobs in the fourth grade. My grandfather and my dad have C cups, for Christ’s sake.

I lied to myself by thinking I found a way to look as waspy-ishly beguiling as the women in my J. Crew catalog. Instead, I became Jennifer Love Hewitt, J.D.

There was a time when I believed that my natural assets might supplement my impeccable work ethic and intelligence. That ship has sailed. The Corri Fetmans of the world can have at it.  I want none of the extra billable hours that Mad Men-style curves can attract. So shouldn’t a place as benign as J. Crew be able to provide the wardrobe for this new chapter in my career?

Decidedly not.

5comments

I Need the Weekend Dress Code

by Ex-Bitter on September 19, 2008 in Columns

Post image for I Need the Weekend Dress Code

QHey, I’m a female first-year associate at a big Manhattan firm, and I just started. Anyway, I have to work this weekend for the first time. I assume I can wear jeans or basically whatever, right? Is anything too casual for weekend work.

AFor the most part, you can wear whatever you want. Just don’t get too experimental or overly stylish. It’s a weekend, yeah, but don’t bust out your East Hampton braless, flip-flop look. Keep it simple. Jeans, shirt, sweater.